Ruling By Centuries Old Methods

Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.

Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

-Gustave Gilbert, German speaking intelligence officer and psychologist, interviewed and recorded the observations of Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichmarshal and Luftwafe Chief during Nurenburg Trials, 1946

 What Herman Goering described was the effectiveness of using Problem-Reaction-Solution to carry out an agenda contrary to the goals of the public. The Nazi's burned the Reichstag building and later blamed it on a mentally disabled man they labeled as a communist using this method.

Göring and Goebbels, with Hitler's approval, hatched a plan to cause panic by burning the Reichstag building and blaming the Communists. The Reichstag was the building in Berlin where the elected members of the republic met to conduct the daily business of government.

By a weird coincidence, there was also in Berlin a deranged Communist conducting a one-man uprising. An arsonist named Marinus van der Lubbe, 24, from Holland, had been wandering around Berlin for a week attempting to burn government buildings to protest capitalism and start a revolt. On February 27, he decided to burn the Reichstag building.

Carrying incendiary devices, he spent all day lurking around the building, before breaking in around 9 p.m. He took off his shirt, lit it on fire, then went to work using it as his torch.

The exact sequence of events will never be known, but Nazi storm troopers under the direction of Göring were also involved in torching the place. They had befriended the arsonist and may have known or even encouraged him to burn the Reichstag that night. The storm troopers, led by SA leader Karl Ernst, used the underground tunnel that connected Göring's residence with the cellar in the Reichstag. They entered the building, scattered gasoline and incendiaries, then hurried back through the tunnel.

However the Nazis were not the first to take advantage of the people using Problem - Reaction - Solution.

The emperor Nero ruled Rome from 54 to 68 AD. On the night of July 19, 64 A.D., a fire broke out among the shops lining the Circus Maximus, Rome's mammoth chariot stadium. When the smoke cleared, 10 of Rome's 14 districts were in ruin. The 800-year-old Temple of Jupiter Stator and the Atrium Vestae, the hearth of the Vestal Virgins, were gone. Two thirds of Rome had been destroyed.

History has blamed Nero for the disaster, implying that he started the fire so that he could bypass the senate and rebuild Rome to his liking. Much of what is known about the great fire of Rome comes from the aristocrat and historian Tacitus, who claimed that Nero watched Rome burn while merrily playing his fiddle. Gangs of thugs prevented citizens from fighting the fire with threats of torture, Tacitus wrote. There is some support for the theory that Nero leveled the city on purpose: the Domus Aurea, Nero's majestic series of villas and pavilions set upon a landscaped park and a man-made lake, was built in the wake of the fire.

Neither human effort nor princely largesse nor divine appeasement was able to dispel the scandal that the fire (which burned much of Rome in 64 CE) was believed to have been commanded (by the emperor Nero). So, to do away with the rumor, Nero substituted as culprits those who were commonly called "Christians," who were hated because of their absurdities. And he inflicted them with the most extraordinary punishments.

Thousands of years later the same principle is being used to carry out agendas on behalf of the elite. 




The neoconservative movement was founded by Leo Strauss, a professor at the University of Chicago. His and the movement’s principles are striking and clear. They see the goal of foreign policy to be dominance on a global scale using military might. The public is perceived as mindless barbarians who are savage in nature. The only way to rectify this nature of humans is to have the few noble elite at the top control and command the masses by deception. Those at the top he dubbed “the wise” and those at the bottom “the vulgar”. Anyone who does not buy into the idea of war is to be attacked for “lack of patriotism and exposing the world to danger.” 


Even more striking is not the fact that such an evil philosophy exists, but that many of our leaders during the Bush administration subscribed to it. The Project for a New American Century is a Washington D.C. based neoconservative think-tank which houses many important officials - some who studied and earned PhDs directly under Leo Strauss. To name only a few - Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz (Deputy Secretary of State), Lewis Libby (Chief of Staff for VP Cheney), Richard Perle, and more. An enormous amount of power and influence was held by this group of wise, elite men.


Only a year before the attacks on 9/11, PNAC produced a report entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, which would lay the foundation for United States foreign policy under Bush. The goals stated in this report were to increase US global dominance using military forces and dramatically increase the defense budget. 


The goals of the US military were to “defend the American homeland; fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars; perform the “constabulary” duties associated with shaping the security environment in critical regions; transform U.S. forces to exploit the “revolution in military affairs”.


Section V of the report entitled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force” begins “to preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.” 
The authors stated the goal to be a “transformation” of attitude and US foreign policy which would increase the defense budget and allow the US military the capability to enforce it’s agenda worldwide. 


However, winning over the public and enacting this transformation wouldn’t be that easy. Admitting the difficulty, the report states “…The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”


Sadly, a year later such an event did occur when multiple attacks were carried out on US soil which ultimately provided the public's motivation for the global “war on terror" conveniently fulfilling the goals of the neo-conservatives and PNAC.


Between Each of these events numerous other instances have been carried out or allowed to happen using the Problem-Reaction-Solution paradigm including but not limited to: The Spanish American War, WW1, WW2 and Vietnam. 


Thousands of years old and boldly brazen, the Problem - Reaction - Solution method for carrying out war and violence is still being used yet hidden from view of the public. Both Herman Goering and Leo Strauss would agree that deceiving the masses to bring them to the bidding of their leaders has, and will continue to be, profoundly successful. 


I urge you to take a closer look at the history of The United States' armed conflict and the deception used to persuade the masses of it's necessity. Informing yourself of this past will increase your understanding of the present.


New American Century is a 10 part documentary outlining PNAC and just such a history.

Thought Regarding Global Warming (aka Climate Change aka Global Climate Disruption)

The driving force behind the case for anthropogenic global warming is fear. Melting ice caps, drowning polar bears, droughts, floods, hurricanes, starvation and disease. You name it, global warming will induce it. The intense campaign promoting the prediction is wrought with unfounded fear mongering.

The prediction based off their climate models is that in 50 or 100 years we're doomed. However, it was established long ago that accurately predicting weather even 4 or 5 days in advance is about our limit. The factors involved in the system that creates climate are FAR too numerous for us to realize.

This is evident in the work of Henri Poincaré's 3-body Problem and Meteorologist Edward Lorenz.

Jules Henri Poincaré (29 April 1854 – 17 July 1912) was a French mathematician, theoretical physicist, and a philosopher of science. He is often described as a polymath, and in mathematics as The Last Universalist, since he excelled in all fields of the discipline as it existed during his lifetime.



Henri Poincaré attempted to answer the question of whether the solar system was stable forever, or if some planets would just simply drift off. This required an attempt to solve the celestial 3-body problem.

The 3 Body problem: Given 3 bodies (e.g. Sun, moon, Earth) and their initial positions and velocities, the problem is to determine the motion of the 3 bodies attracting one another according to Newtons law of gravity. Whilst the it sounds quite straightforward, the problem is surprisingly difficult to solve.

Issac Newton had solved the 2-Body problem and a solution was sought for the 3-Body problem and more generally the N-Body problem).

Given the deterministic way of thought, people believed that they could predict into the future provided they have sufficient information. Thus, given sufficient information they could easily solve the 3-Body problem.

In 1887 the King of Sweden and Norway, Oscar II, initiated a mathematical competition to celebrate his 60th Birthday in 1889. Henri Poincaré selected the 3-Body problem (actually, he considered a 9-Body problem: the then known about 8 planets plus the Sun. However, he realised that the minor components of the solar system would produce perturbations on the planets and thus the problem was closer to a 50-Body problem. He immediately saw the difficulty with this and restricted himself to the 3-Body problem.)

What Poincaré found was that when you add just one body to the problem, it becomes dramatically more complex, and extensively harder to predict an outcome given the multitude of unknown factors associated with this extra body. The slightest perturbation in just one of the bodies dramatically affects the whole in unpredictable ways. This is why he changed his work from that of the solar system (nine planets) to just three.

Edward Norton Lorenz (May 23, 1917 - April 16, 2008) was an American mathematician and meteorologist, and a pioneer of chaos theory.

Lorenz was using a simple digital computer, a Royal McBee LGP-30, to run his weather simulation. He wanted to see a sequence of data again and to save time he started the simulation in the middle of its course. He was able to do this by entering a printout of the data corresponding to conditions in the middle of his simulation which he had calculated last time.

To his surprise the weather that the machine began to predict was completely different from the weather calculated before. Lorenz tracked this down to the computer printout. The computer worked with 6-digit precision, but the printout rounded variables off to a 3-digit number, so a value like 0.506127 was printed as 0.506. This difference is tiny and the consensus at the time would have been that it should have had practically no effect. However Lorenz had discovered that small changes in initial conditions produced large changes in the long-term outcome. Lorenz's discovery, which gave its name to Lorenz attractors, proved that meteorology could not reasonably predict weather beyond a weekly period (at most).

Both the three-body problem and the problem Lorenz faced indicate that there is an incredible amount of unpredictability in complex systems. Simply, a light perturbation in a system that affects climate (such as solar radiation, earth's orbit, human influence) will dramatically affect the climatic outcome. This is called sensitive dependence on initial conditions.

To discover every perturbation in each element that makes up the system of climate is impossible.
To know how each of these perturbations affects each other and eventually determines an outcome is inconceivable.


Beyond the scientific quandary of predicting such outcomes lies various political motivations.

As we have seen in the past, the government capitalizes on disasters in order to carry out policy that otherwise would not have been possible.
Before World War 2 America as a whole held isolationist beliefs, they were hesitant to join Europe in fighting the Axis. However, Pearl Harbor changed that.
More recently, the events on 9/11/2001 changed foreign as well as domestic policy in huge ways. We have now been at war for 9 years and our civil liberties have constantly been under pressure.

The government can not only use these events to their advantage after the fact, but create and/or control them as well.

This is called Problem - Reaction - Solution

Create a problem

Solicit a reaction

Offer a solution



I believe they are creating, or at the very least exaggerating a threat of global disaster. They are soliciting a reaction by inundating us with disastrous predictions and social pressure by telling us "the debate is over" and to get in line. The solutions they are offering us though I do not yet know. Many are concerned with a carbon tax and further police state action. If history is any judge, it will involve more restriction on the individual by the state, certainly not the other way around.

Climategate

Stolen emails from the leading source pushing the climate change theory and predictions showed lies and cover up involving the motivation and data backing their climate forecasts.



Rational Physicist, MIT professor and IPCC author Richard Lindzen extrapolates on the issue as a whole



There are enough red flags surrounding this issue that warrant a re-examination of global warming and the motivations behind it's propagation. As Lindzen points out, you shouldn't take it on faith that you're being told the truth. Look beyond media blurbs and sound bites and examine for yourself.

CIA Handler Anwar Al-Awlaki

Reposting this Infowars article for posterity.

Evidence shows that Awlaki had numerous connections to terrorists and was recently invited to the pentagon. The allegation is that Anwar handles Islamic patsies on behalf of the CIA in order to carry out false flag terror.

HERE'S THE ARTICLE:

9/11 Mastermind Invited to Pentagon


In the article, the link is made between Awlaki and the Underwear Bomber. Author Paul Watson points to a possible false-flag incident.

Monetary incentive, as well as sufficient capability to carry out an attack was there for former Director of Homeland Securty, Michael Chertoff.

Soon after the Underwear Bomber incident Chertoff began pushing hard for the so called Naked Body Scanners.
Chertoff admittedly benefits directly from the Sale of these scanners which are said to potentially cause cancer.



Any incident of supposed false flag terror cannot be looked at in isolation. The history of such attacks must first also be addressed. The likelihood of our government purposely killing civilians and carrying out terror seems very unlikely without the knowledge that such events have actually been carried out numerous times and documented.

For a brief history of government sponsored terror, watch the documentary Terror Storm


Once one begins to realize the history, capability and willingness our government has to carry out false flag attacks, one gains a new understanding of the events taking place today.

Microwave Weapons

I was just reading a few interesting things regarding microwave guns and microwave auditory effects.

Turns out in the mid 70's they were able to send intelligible one-syllable voices into people's heads.

Here's a government patent from 1974 for a device to "alter brain waves"

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=ZpszAAAAEBAJ





A 1980 NASA research study using this research states that:

"A decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create the perception of noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves. When people are illuminated with properly modulated low power microwaves the sensation is reported as a buzzing, clicking, or hissing which seems to originate (regardless of the person's position in the field) within or just behind the head. The phenomena occurs at average power densities as low as microwatts per square centimeter with carrier frequencies from 0.4 to 3.0 GHz. [B]By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created.[/B] Before this technique may be extended and used for military applications, an understanding of the basic principles must be developed. Such an understanding is not only required to optimize the use of the concept for camouflage, decoy and deception operations but is required to properly assess safety factors of such microwave exposure."

http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.html


In 2002 the government came out with a patent for

"A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor filtering to produce an encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor filtering, intelligible subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF Hearing Effect"

"Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a novel technique for the intelligible encoding of signals. A related object is to provide for the intelligible encoding of speech.

Another object of the invention is to make use of the Radio Frequency ("RF") Hearing Effect in the intelligible demodulation of encoded signals, including speech."

http://www.google.com/patents?id=yKULAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&source=gbs_overview_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

From the DOD's Bioeffects of Nonlethal Weapons classified document released under the FOIA released in 2006.

"Possible Influence on Subject(s)
Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message transmission. It may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard "voices within one's head"

In 1998, it came out that under a Navy contract, a company came out with a device called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio). Using this technology it was designed for military or crowd control purposes and can be coupled with a vehicle. It can be aimed toward an individual or multiple people at the same time.

http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5305386

Somewhat related...

In the December 1980 edition of the U. S. Army Journal, called the Military Review, a column by Lt. Col John B. Alexander, entitled, 'The New Mental Battlefield: Beam Me Up, Spock,' provides further insight into the technical capabilities at the disposal of the comptroller. He writes:

"Several examples will demonstrate areas in which progress have been made. The transference of energy from one organism to another; the ability to heal or cause disease to be transmitted over a distance, thus inducing illness or death from no apparent cause; telepathic behavior modification which includes the ability to induce hypnotic states up to a distance of 1,000 kilometers have been reported.

Researchers suggest that certain extremely-low-frequency (ELF) emissions possess psychoactive characteristics.15 These transmissions can be used to induce depression or irritability in a target population. The application of large-scale ELF behavior modification could have horrendous impact.
The use of telepathic hypnosis also holds great potential. This capability could allow agents to be deeply planted with no conscious knowledge of their programming. In movie terms, the Manchurian Candidate lives, and does not even require a telephone call. 'Other mind-to-mind induction techniques are being considered. If perfected this capability could allow the direct transference of thought via telepathy from one mind or group of minds to a select target audience. The unique factor is that the recipient will not be aware that thought has been implanted from an external source. He or she will believe the thoughts are original."

"The information presented here will be considered by some to be ridiculous since it does not conform to their view of reality, but some people still believe the world is flat. Other readers may view this as a conservative approach because such controversial areas as hyperspatial transmitters or Tesla wave generators have not been addressed."

So, according to this Lt. Colonel, they've been able to adjust and control the mental state of individuals and even use the technology to kill them since 1980.

Here is there Lt. colonel's paper

Much of this was taken from Serge Monast's article on Project Bluebeam from 1994 which can be found HERE

I have yet to look into Monast's article and Project Bluebeam as a whole, but it certaily holds my interest.